Tuesday 26 January 2010

Healthy soil, truly nutritious food and profitable, sustainable farming: Key to health



This man is worth listening to:

"In 1999, Jerry was diagnosed with non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma and given as little as six months to live without aggressive chemotherapy. He instead chose a holistic path of nutrition, detoxification and immune modulation and applied his vast experience with farming and animal nutrition to his own health. The links between healthy soil, truly nutritious food and profitable, sustainable farming are clearly evident in his personal and professional experiences and his skill for communicating this to people has won him extensive praise from holistic health professionals, sustainable farming organizations and many farmers and consumers".



Agri Dynamics Homepage

Jerry is interviewed here by Kathleen Slattery-Moschkau on The Kathleen Show

http://thekathleenshow.typepad.com/blog/2009/12/kicking-cancers-butt-with-natural-remedies.html

Monday 25 January 2010

Ethics, AMA and that South Australian Homebirth 'study'



Barbara Katz Rothman, Ph.D,  Professor Department of Sociology,  City University of New York, is the author of fabulous books such as The Tentative Pregnancy and In Labour: Women and Power in the Birthplace. W.W. Norton and Company, 1982, now updated as Laboring On: Birth in Transition in the United States, With Wendy Simonds and Bari Meltzer Norman. Routledge, 2007.

Professor Katz Rothman famously said "Birth is not only about making babies. Birth is about making mothers - strong, competent, capable mothers who trust themselves and know their inner strength".


Barbara Katz Rothman made another great comment about how whenever there is a move to return power to women, patriarchal interests rise up in protest to reclaim their position. I haven't got the exact quote, but something along that line.

What is particularly interesting right now is that the negative voice of reproductive medicine headed by their president, is growing louder and louder, warning everyone that birth is dangerous!  The voice is getting louder, telling women and the community that birth at  home is dangerous, just as the Federal Government begins to move to increase women's birth choices and position midwifery as the health care profession most suitable and appropriate to provide primary health care for childbearing women.

Coincidentally, a report on homebirth in South Australia was published recently in the AMA medical journal.

Medical Journal of Australia article on SA homebirth

The president of the AMA Dr Andrew Pesce, wrote the editorial of the issue of the AMJ which published the 'study'. He listed his competing interests this way

"I am President of the Australian Medical Association, which is opposed to home birth in Australia".

The title of Dr Pesce's editorial is "Planned home birth in Australia: politics or science?"

Dr Andrew Pesce (Dr 3am)'s Editorial in the MJA

Good question, Dr Pesche, all looks good and transparent on the surface so far!

Dr Pesche discussed the controversy surrounding homebirth and midwifery practice and quoted the following 'facts' from the 'study' of SA homebirth statistics:

"planned home birth was associated with a sevenfold increase in risk of intrapartum perinatal mortality compared with planned hospital birth, and a 27-fold higher risk of death due to intrapartum asphyxia.6 These differences were significant despite a sample size of only 1141 home births. Overall perinatal mortality standardised for gestation and birthweight was more than double that of planned hospital births, but because of low numbers these differences were not statistically significant. Of course, not all severe adverse perinatal outcomes in labour can be avoided, but they are better avoided, statistically speaking, when birth is planned to take place in a hospital birth unit".


Deeper analysis of the 'data' reveals the statistics are somewhat skewed. I have written else where about the results of this 'study'.  As the old truism goes there are 'lies, damned lies and statistics' - it requires enormous rigor and willingness to look at one's blind spots when interpreting statisics.  One of the ways to assist with blind spot removal is to have independant reviewers go over the results of data interpretation. Everyone would presume the AMJ would do that to maintain credibility and transparency. A reasonable assumption given that the Journal’s website links to the World Association of Medical Editors Position Statement on “Conflict of Interest in Peer-Reviewed Medical Journals”: http://www.wame.org/conflict-of-interest-in-peer-reviewed-medical-journals

However, following various online articles debunking the analysis of the statistics, including an article by Melissa Sweet at Crikey.com  Don't believe the homebirth horror headlines galvanised Dr Pesche and the AMA to seek a right of reply.

In his reply to the criticism of both the article and his editorial, Dr Pesce said

"My editorial was primarily about the politics of home birth.  Most neutral commentators have commended me on the balance of the editorial".

As Croakey comments "Dr Andrew Pesce, for those who haven’t been following the story thus far, is the president of the AMA (which opposes homebirth), an obestetrician and gynaecologist, one of the reviewers of the new study, and also the author of the MJA editorial on the study".

Now wait a minute! Dr Pesce was one of the reviewers of the new study? Hmmmm  and wasn't Dr Mark Keirse, an obstetrician,  one of the authors of the discredited Bastion study also cited by Pesce as evidence of the dangerous nature of birth at home?

Uh oh.  Excuse me,  the bias is showing.

I'd love to know who the 'neutral commentators' were!

Using 'science' to back up biased opinions is hardly new or unique to this particular study and the rhetoric which surrounds it.  However, frightening childbearing women and the community about the safety of birth in any context is unethical, given what we know about the way that the hormones of fear impact upon both the fetus and the woman.

Dr Pesce also asks the reader

"...to be fair, my editorial did mention the lower intervention rates, the similar rate of post partum haemorrhage and other favourable outcomes of home births found in the study".

Dr Pesce needs to listen to the despairing voices of midwives and student midwives who struggle daily with the way that medicine interferes, disrupts and pushes the birthing process into places that women are not ready to go with disabling consequences.

for example

"So, after watching BOBB (The Business of Being Born) and doing my current reading about the history of midwifery/hospitals/medicine, my eyes have been opened, yet again (still!) as to how harmful the hospital environment can be towards childbirth and women.

Yes, hospitals, medicine and nursing care can save lives. However, ever notice the trickle down effect of us *causing* some of the problems in the first place?"
Some self loathing, some guilt, and a whole lot of venting

It's time Dr Pesce to stand back and look at who's interests are being served in this 'debate' and controversy?  This 'shroud waving' and 'spin doctoring' of facts is an 'emperor has no clothes' kind of situation. What do we make of it in light of the fact that over $2.11 million dollars of tax payer's 'safety net' money has been siphoned off into the pockets of some doctors?

Changes to obstetric safety net are fair, despite foul cries – Croakey


The big question is how do we get to work together so that the woman is in control of her body and reproductive process and we as health care professionals are there to support and encourage every woman to feel safe in her own body and respected for her evidence informed choices?  There are some great doctors who really respect women and believe that the natural brilliance of the birth process works well when women are informed and supported to labour and birth undisturbed in the place of her choosing. These doctors are there, respectfully supportive for the rare occasion when some kind of intervention is warranted.


Birth is as safe as life gets Dr Pesce.  The therapeutic use of self as a health care practitioner is what makes both life and birth safer. As Barbara Katz Rothman says "birth is about making strong and capable mothers". Time to stop pulling the rug from under women's sense of self with all this 'turf war' rhetoric!


What to do about the top 15 chemical additives in your food and other hazards

I found the article  Top 15 chemical additives in your food informative and concerning. We are the product of what we eat and we are affected by all the chemicals in our environment.  For pregnant women, what they eat today, walks and talks tomorrow - to borrow and adapt the advertising tagline of a bread manufacturer.

Some additives are said to enhance the nutritive value of the food. More information about what is safe and what is unsafe is available here http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm

Over 86,000 man made chemicals are now found in our environment, the number of synthetic chemicals has grown exponentially in 100 years. There were a little over 100 at the beginning of the 1900's. Our bodies are truly amazing that we maintain our health as well as we do, given the number of synthetic substances that our bodies process. Here's a report by the CDC on the measurements of 212 of these chemicals in human blood or urine

http://www.cdc.gov/exposurereport/

Many of the synthetic chemicals are hazardous to human health. One of the ways our bodies cope with toxic chemicals is to sequester them within fat cells. Chemical toxicity is said to be one of the components of the obesity epidemic. Obesity itself is associated with a burgeoning disease rate in the population. More worrying still is that up to 232 toxic chemicals have been detected in newborn cord blood (please see link below for report on umbilical cord blood report)

EWG Minority Cord Blood Report Executive Summary | Environmental Working Group


Even 'healthy' processed foods are suspect. Bonsoy, a popular soy milk drink was recalled in late December 2009 because of unsafe levels of iodine which caused illness in a cluster of people in NSW. Although iodine is necessary for optimal health, too much or too little is dangerous. Ironically , the Australian government was concerned with the drop in the use of iodised salt and has recently legislated for bread makers to add iodine to bread! Only organic bread is exempt.

http://www.recalls.gov.au/content/index.phtml/itemId/971373

What can we do to minimise the effects of these synthetic and natural chemicals?

For a start, eliminate and avoid the synthetic ones and ensure the right intake of naturally occurring vitamins and minerals. To do so makes sense from a biological and ecological perspective.

Some suggestions include:

1. If you smoke, stop!










2. Drink lots of purified water - get a good purifier one that also removes 'bugs' - if you want to know a good one, contact me for a recommendation

3. Avoid processed food

4. take high quality, natural, organic supplements, including Omega 3's and antioxidants. Contact me if you want the best brand

5. Eat whole foods - buy locally grown


6. Avoid out of season whole foods - transportation involves time and chemical preservatives

7. Eat fresh foods - lots of salads


8. When you cook, cook slowly - avoid microwaves - keep veges crisp - do not use bicarb to keep greens 'green' - cook for a short time only

9. Reduce calories

10. Reduce salt intake

11. Reduce sugar intake

12. Drink green tea - antioxidant

13. Avoid transfats


14. Reduce your dependence on plastics of all kinds - bisphenol A is proving to be a real menace

15. Reduce pesticide use - go for the natural ways as much as possible

16. Grow your own veges and companion plant them


Companion planting guide

 
17. When you grow your own veges, use natural fertilisers, not chemicals.


18. Don't use talcum powder - irritates mucous membranes and is associated with lung and ovarian cancer

19. Don't burn incense - the smoke is an irritant, as menacing as tobacco smoke

20. Get regular, brisk exercise every day for at least 30 minutes - helps the lymph system move toxins along and out - along with all the other benefits of walking

Monday 18 January 2010

Birth at home Safer than at Hospital: eMJA: Planned home birth in Australia: politics or science?

Good news from the latest review of homebirth statistics. Despite the fact that the AMA can't read research, and then go on to make gooses out of themselves by quoting incorrect statistics to frighten people about birth, the news for women who want to have their babies at home is very good.

The correct information is this:

1. The rate of perinatal mortality for the period under examination (1991-2006) was 8.2 per 1000 births for planned hospital births; for infants born at home 2.5 per 1000 births.

According to the reviewers, one of the two infants who died after being born at home

"had congenital anomalies suspected on ultrasound; the parents declined further investigation, and the infant had palliative care and died from lethal anomalies. The other was a fresh stillbirth from a water birth. Although birth under water was thought not to have contributed to the death, closer monitoring during labour may have changed the outcome.


The evidence clearly shows that birth at home is safer than birth in hospital!

Image from Wikipedia


The reviewers said:

Although it is not anticipated that large numbers of women will opt for home birth, women’s autonomy in choosing reproductive behaviour is a fundamental human right enshrined in Australian law.4 Respecting their choices and achieving the best outcome for all concerned is likely to remain a challenge that will require more light and less heat than it has received thus far.


A pity that the AMA has chosen the route of "Lies, damned lies and statistics" to further their 'shroud waving' agenda to frighten women and their families about birth.




eMJA: Planned home birth in Australia: politics or science?

The really important point amidst all this stupid shroud waving and fear mongering on behalf of the AMA is that women do best where they feel safest. Our jobs as health professionals is to be supportive of women's choices and provide an environment where women feel supported and cared about and to intervene appropriately. That's it.

Sadly, the AMA has forgotten about the therapeutic use of self. Using fear to coerce women into submission to fit the 9-5 agenda is not kind, good or ethical.

Sunday 17 January 2010

Overdue NSW woman gets police check up | News.com.au

A New South Wales woman, Rochelle Allan and her partner Daniel Jones, have been seeing their private midwife throughout her pregnancy and attending the local hospital for the screening tests that are routine in pregnancy. Rochelle and Daniel's intention was to have their second baby at home with a midwife they knew and trusted.

Rochelle and Daniel, looking forward to their new baby (from News.com.au)


"Ms Allan said that she had decided on having a home birth after a "horrific experience" at the same hospital two years ago when their son Bailey was born. I was induced and I spent 48 hours in labour," she said. "I don't want to go through with that again."

Ms Rochelle Allan was twelve days overdue and attended the hospital for a routine,  "CTG" a monitoring process, that records the fetus's heart rate and the woman's uterine activity together. The idea of this test, is to pick up any signs of fetal distress. The CTG is a useful tool, but no guarantee. The best way to ensure a fetus is well and happy is to ensure the woman feels relaxed, connected with her baby, well supported and knows her baby's movements - the mother is often able to detect if things are not 'right' and contact her caregiver for a check up. The CTG was normal and reassuring, however the doctors decided that Rochelle needed to be induced because she was 12 days overdue (not even two weeks overdue!) and booked her for induction the next day. Rochelle declined to be induced and told the hospital staff that and reminded them that she was giving birth at home with her midwife. Ms Allan rang the hospital and told them the next day that labour was beginning and she wouldn't be coming in.

The hospital staff sent the police around to 'check up' on Rochelle.


"I couldn't believe it when I saw the police officers at my door," Ms Allan said. "They told me they had been asked by the hospital to check on my welfare because I had not attended".
"The hospital knew I did not want to be induced and they gave me no medical reason why I should be."
Throughout her pregnancy, Ms Allan and her partner Daniel Jones have been regularly attending the hospital's antenatal clinic for mandatory tests and scans to monitor the baby's progress. A hospital spokeswoman confirmed police were sent to Ms Allan's house to conduct a "welfare check".


http://www.news.com.au/national/overdue-pregnant-nsw-woman-gets-police-check-up/story-e6frfkvr-1225820277538



Now, I didn't know that NSW was a police state! I live here and I didn't know that.  Well, clearly the decision to send the police around was made in error, because the next day, the following headline appeared in the 'news'.


Home birth mum receives apology

http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/home-birth-mum-receives-apology/story-e6frfku0-1225820359124

The report says:

The Greater Western Area Health Service today offered Ms Allan an apology for the unexpected police visit, saying they just wanted to check she was alright.

"We are sorry if it ... caused her any distress but our intention was to check on her welfare," area health spokeswoman Sue-Anne Redmond told ABC Radio today.

The health service denied it was trying to pressure Ms Allan into being induced.

Sure sounds like 'pressure' to me!

Sending the police to get people to comply in a health related matter like this is 'bullying' and as such, is against the law. We all know what bullying does to a person's physiology! What an outrageous thing to happen to a pregnant woman, especially at this stage of her pregnancy, when peace, calmness and support are the ideal environmental conditions for a happy labour and birth.

There is a very happy ending to this story, as well as the very welcome news that the health service very sensibly apologised, as they should, for their heavy handed tactics with this young woman.

Rochelle gave birth to her beautiful baby this morning, in the peace and quiet of her own home, with her husband and her midwife. Her midwife drove three hours to be with Rochelle and her partner for the birth! Well done team!

  Welcome to your new baby Rochelle and Daniel. I bet Bailey is thrilled.

Thursday 14 January 2010

Stress triggers tumor formation, researchers find

Stress triggers tumor formation, researchers find

January 13, 2010

Stress induces signals that cause cells to develop into tumors, Yale researchers have discovered. The research, published online Jan. 13 in the journal Nature, describes a novel way cancer takes hold in the body and suggests new ways to attack the deadly disease.


Stress is a biological term which refers to the consequences of the failure of a human or animal to respond appropriately to emotional or physical threats to the organism, whether actual or imagined. It includes a state of alarm and adrenaline production, short-term resistance as a coping mechanism, and exhaustion. Common stress symptoms include irritability, muscular tension, inability to concentrate and a variety of physical reactions, such as headaches and elevated heart rate.

For more information about Stress (biological), read the full article at Wikipedia.
This text uses material from Wikipedia and is available under the GNU Free Documentation License.

Stress triggers tumor formation, researchers find

"A lot of different conditions can trigger stress signaling: physical stress, emotional stress, infections, inflammation - all these things. Another bad news for cancer" Xu said.
The researchers studied the activity of two genes known to be involved in development of human cancers: a gene called RAS that has been implicated in 30 percent of cancers, and a tumor-suppressing gene called scribble, which contributes to tumor development when mutated. Neither of these mutant genes cause cancer on their own, it's when they are together in the same or adjacent cells that the problem begins. A signaling process called JNK, is activated by environmental stress conditions leading to the aberrant behaviour of the two genes.

Short term stress is managed generally, well by the homeostatic mechanisms of the person's physiology. Chronic, unremitting reaction to environmental stressors is where the real problem lies - more and more evidence is showing that inflammatory processes are a big issue. The challenge is for us, especially in the modern fast paced world, to slow down, relax more, switch on the parasympathetic aspect of our nervous systems. We need to chill out,'smell the roses', have massages, walk along the beach, marvel at natuare, eat good food slowly, exercise, take time for fun and good things in our lives. The most powerful stress reduction activity is to surround ourselves with people who love us. Social support is the key to a healthy, happy, joyous life.

Of course, I have to relate this information to childbearing women!

Knowledge about the effects of environmental stress on our physiology is growing exponentially. The effect of stress on childbearing women is becoming more widely known. Stress reduction strategies for childbearing women are a must for healthy happy mothers and babies. One strategy that has immense value is one to one midwifery care. We know how effective social support is to human wellbeing. Midwifery support is an exponential increase in support for childbearing women because one to one midwifery care provides social and professional support, helping women to create an environment within which they feel safe, loved and respected and in control of their bodies and their decisions.

As researchers learn more and more about genetic behaviour; how genes are modified in response to environmental conditions; how what used to be called 'junk DNA' is now recognised as the extraordinary, complicated multifactorial process of RNA transcription and methylation that gives us all our unique aspects, the vitally and crucial need to take real care of childbearing women will become more and more apparent.

Monday 11 January 2010

peaceful parenting: Breastfeeding Baby Jesus

This video shows religious art - images of Mary breastfeeding baby Jesus. What the images reveal is the societal attitude towards breastfeeding at the time the art work was created.

Note the hand positions of Mary and the age of the various representations of baby Jesus. 

A wonderful compilation from Danelle Frisbie at Peaceful Parenting. Danelle has a wonderful blog. http://www.drmomma.org/




peaceful parenting: Breastfeeding Baby Jesus

The most natural thing in the world!

The street were I live is on a little peninsula, boarded by a river on one side and a lake on the other. At the end of the street is a walking track through the bush to the end of the peninsula where the river meets the lake. The track is about a kilometre long.

looking out along the track


I have been writing a chapter on the birth environment in a new book by Lorna Davis called "Sustainability, Midwifery and Birth", the focus of which is reducing the carbon footprint of maternity care and the midwife's role in that. I took time out from the final edits and rejigging of the content yesterday evening to go for a walk. As I was walking back from the end of the track, musing about the chapter,  a young couple holding hands were walking towards me.

The father was 'wearing' a baby in a carrier produced by the Australian Breastfeeding Association. I stopped and said hello, congratulating them and commenting on the lovely baby to be told the baby was born the night before last. As we chatted, they told me they had their baby at home - 'in the water', said the proud grinning father as he gently stroked his daughter's hair. The mother was smiling with that look that new mothers who feel fabulous and proud of themselves do. Their conversation about their birth experience was calm, relaxed and full of a sense of joy. The young woman told me her sister is a midwife (who I know) and that the experience had been wonderful. Her confidence was palpable. Being in their presence was such a gift.

I left that couple and their new baby and walked back home, thinking about their experience. That woman's labour and birth was a perfect example of how birth, when women feel good and in control and surrounded by people who love and support her and her process, is a sustainable, eco-friendly human activity.

If ever anyone needs a reason to protect, promote and support normal natural birth, that woman and her experience provides a shining example of how birth is meant to be.

The most natural thing in the world...

Saturday 9 January 2010

Changes to obstetric safety net are fair, despite foul cries – Croakey

Dr Hilary Joyce, President of the National Association of Specialist Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (NASOG), wants to work with the Federal Government early next year to find an alternative solution to lessen the financial impact on mothers-to-be. NASOG is concerned that pregnant women are in for a New Year shock as the Government's budget cuts to the antenatal safety net package takes affect. NASOG distributed a media release about their concerns.

http://www.aushealthcare.com.au/documents/news/15970/NASOG%2004.01.10.pdf


Dr Sally K Tracy is Professor of Midwifery at the University of Sydney. Professor Tracy admits she has a vested interest. Her vested interest, as stated on the Crikey blog, is in encouraging the Commonwealth government to increase accessibility to midwifery care for all women; and fully supports the Commonwealth government’s initiatives under the maternity services reform package. A pretty good vested interest to have as the evidence has repeatedly demonstrated that childbearing women and their babies are safer with midwifery care.

Professor Tracy: "thought a little historical context might give readers a deeper understanding of the issues involved, and reassure women that the reform is aimed at creating a fairer system".

and explained

“The Medicare Safety Net was aimed at protecting all Australians from high out-of-pocket costs for medical services provided outside hospital.
In March 2004 the Howard Government changed the Medicare Safety Net to allow for an unlimited, non means tested increase in the supplement payable for Medicare benefits for these charges over and above a threshold set by the government each year.
The inherent risks in introducing an unlimited benefit were soon realised when it was discovered that the safety net was not necessarily benefiting those with a low to middle income or who were sickest in the community, despite the existence of a lower threshold making it easier for them to qualify.
The people who really benefited were the providers themselves. It was found that some doctors were cleverly taking advantage of the safety net to increase their fees with the knowledge that the majority of the cost would be refunded by the government. In 2008 this cost Medicare (and the taxpayer) the sum of $211.3 million.
In fact in the five years since the introduction of the new safety net, fees charged by private obstetricians for in-hospital services reduced by six per cent, whilst the fees charged for out of hospital expenses such as the ‘antenatal care package’ increased by 267 per cent".

Now, who is it that has vested self- interests? How interesting is it that the original intent of the safety net was to help the public, but the doctors found a loophole and benefited themselves to the tune of $211.3 million of tax payers money.
read more here

Changes to obstetric safety net are fair, despite foul cries – Croakey

BBC News - Dopamine levels in brain 'influence decision making'

Dopamine, a chemical with a key role in setting people's moods, could have a much wider-ranging impact on their everyday lives, research suggests.
Experiments show that altering levels of the chemical in the brain influences the decisions people make.
Professor John Maule, an expert in decision making, at Leeds University Business School, said that in recent years people had begun to realise emotional or "gut instinct" decision making was just as important in human choices as analytical decision making.



BBC News - Dopamine levels in brain 'influence decision making'

YouTube - (Baby's perspective) barnets perspektiv!

Ever wondered what it is like to be baby looking out at the world from inside a pram? Wondered what it is like to be a baby being carried? This short video demonstrates the difference. The language is not English, but for those English speakers, the visual portrays the message brilliantly.



YouTube - Barnets perspektiv!

Tesco Ultra Softcarry Pack Mini 44 product information - Tesco.com

The effects of advertising on human behaviour is well known. Marketing psychologists are paid huge money for coming up with ideas, images, ways of presenting information that influences people subliminally so that they 'naturally' change their behaviour and buy the product.

Look what women and families are being 'sold' in the UK



What's the message here?

Tesco newborn nappies with a beautiful woman and newborn baby. That in itself is fully understandable. However, the packet shows the woman is bottle feeding her newborn. 
Hmmm.  
This photo is clearly a deal made with formula makers (do we smell money kickbacks here) and is the sort of socially corrupt marketing activities that are undermining breastfeeding as normal. This photo is an example of the way that marketing activities by big formula companies are working to make bottle feeding the 'norm' in a subliminal and unfortunately, powerful way.
This behaviour of undermining optimal nutrition for babies for corporate advantage is disgraceful. Many women struggle to breastfeed their babies already with the countless adverse social factors that mitigate against women feeling comfortable in their own bodies.
The future health of babies and society are influenced by this underhanded ' for profit' marketing
While the Code for marketing breastmilk substitutes has some clout, for other advertising there is no such protection. What a pity the genius minds of marketing psychologists aren't gainfully employed in producing campaigns for encourage people to work with their natural, physiological intelligence.  
Oh, wait, there's no money in that! 
UK Marketing Director of Tesco Carolyn Bradley can be contacted on: carolyn.bradley@uk.tesco.com 



Tesco Ultra Softcarry Pack Mini 44 product information - Tesco.com

Reducing infant mortality and improving the health of babies

A powerful video on  Reducing infant mortality and improving the health of babies from film maker and writer Debbie Takikawa


Reducing Infant Mortality from Debby Takikawa on Vimeo.


The risk of premature birth is discussed in  Report: 13 million babies worldwide born premature
and 1 million premature babies die each year

"The preterm birth rate in the USA is especially high: 12.7% of all babies are born early, according to the March of Dimes. That rate has increased 36% in the past 25 years, partly because of an increase in elective cesarean section, an increase in older mothers and the growing use of assisted reproduction, which increases the risk of twins, triples and higher-order multiple births, the report says. Most of the increase in the USA is in "late preterm" babies, born at 34 to 36 weeks of pregnancy, the report says."



The Role of Environmental Hazards in Premature Birth is being more closely examined, because, as Jennifer Howse states in her position statement preceding the conference report

" Not long ago, discourse on preterm birth was nearly always centered on the role of the mother. Increasingly, however, environmental hazards are being recognized as contributors to the devastating and costly problem of preterm birth"
The words reportedly attributed to Nicholas Fisk, director of the University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research in Australia bear close investigation and consideration.

"Instead of focusing on acute preterm labor, researchers might help more women by identifying underlying problems, such as inflammation, that develop early in the pregnancy"

These emerging insights into the role of environmental toxins in premature birth and other disruptions to the whole process are providing a clarion call for the wholehearted support of all childbearing women by community and government structures to reduce stressors so that inflammatory processes are not switched on.

Norweigan Scientist says breastmilk is no better for babies than formula - mirror.co.uk

Interesting report on research from Norway, where breastfeeding support is high and most women breastfeed? What's going on?

Scientist says breastmilk is no better for babies than formula - mirror.co.uk

Statue in front of hospital on Margarita Island Venezuela


UNICEF has refuted the study

http://www.babyfriendly.org.uk/items/item_detail.asp?item=620

Ben Goldacre from Bad Science fame posts the press release that lead to the BIG STORY which has been subsequently plastered all over the media

http://bengoldacre.posterous.com/

These articles and responses to them are well worth reading to get the full story behind the 'story'.

Essentially, what the researchers are saying is that women who have high testosterone levels in pregnancy, have trouble breastfeeding.

There is a very thoughtful informed response by Australia's Karleen Gribble PhD School of Nursing and Midwifery, UWS, reproduced below.
Karleen's post was in response to a query about the study on en-net, " a free and open resource to help field practitioners have access to prompt technical advice for operational challenges for which answers are not readily accessible" The Emergency Nutrition Network is a UK registered international charity, set up by humanitarian agencies to improve effectiveness of emergency food and nutrition interventions through rapid identification and dissemination of lessons learnt in the course of operational practice, and through research and evaluation.
The en-net forum is made possible by the support of the American People through the United States Agency for International Development/Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance (USAID/OFDA) and the support of the Irish People through Irish Aid.
http://www.en-net.org.uk/

Karleen wrote on the above list:

"There's a few things that you need to understand about this study (which I have read) and the context in which it was carried out. This research is from Norway, the country with the best breastfeeding rates in the Western world- 99% initiation of breastfeeding and 80% of women still breastfeeding at 6 months. Societial support for breastfeeding women in Norway is very good. The very small number of women who cease breastfeeding in the early weeks of their infant's life would include those whose have a genuine physiological problem with making sufficient milk for their babies. It was found that these women were more likely to have higher levels of androgens during pregnancy. This is not a huge surprise, it's been something that others have been suggesting for some time (see the book for mothers "Making more Milk" by West and Maracso). The researchers seem to think that androgen levels can account for pretty much every factor associated with early weaning....they are endocrinologists....it's a case of if your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. It's a bit simplistic but there's no doubt that they have found a useful priece of the puzzle.
As to the idea that formula is as good as breastmilk. Well, the references cited in the study as providing evidence for this idea are 4 from the PROBIT study (the huge RCT of the implementation of BFHI in Belarus). The 4 studies cited looked at the impact of BFHI implementation (and lower of higher artificial feeding rates) on child behaviour, growth, dental caries, allergies/asthma- that's it. You'll get few people getting all het up saying you must breastfeed otherwise you're child will have behaviour problems or holes in their teeth. And to be perfectly frank any results from the PROBIT study on allergy and asthma is going to be questionable because the issue with allergic disease is exposure to allergens- and the only way to do this properly is a longitudinal study which records the time of the infant's first exposure to anything other than breastmilk- the only study I am aware of that has done this is one by Wendy Oddy in W Australia (and indeed, the critical factor was the timing of the first exposure to cows milk protein). There was nothing in the study that addressed the most common morbidities and mortalities due to artifical feeding, that is: diarrhoeal disease and respiratory infection.
Shall I be cynical and say that the researchers wanted to get media interest in their study?? (This was just a single small paragraph in the paper) Perhaps. Or maybe they just don't see the adverse effects of formula feeding since they are in Norway, where as I mentioned, just about every woman breastfeeds for a substantial period of time and where they have one of the best public health systems in the world.
And just a note about language when we talk about infant feeding. Breastfeeding is the normal way of feeding babies. It is extremely important and in fact it is vital, essential, indispensible to the wellbeing of infants and young children. It has NO BENEFITS. It is NOT best. Rather, artificial feeding is risky and dangerous. It actively and passively harms the immune system and the health of infants. Breastfeeding does not decrease disease, artificial feeding increases it. Breastfeeding is not best, infant formula is deficient.
This may seem pedantic but we actually have a growing body of evidence that if we talk about breastfeeding as best and the benefits of breastfeeding that we fail to effectively communicate the importance of breastfeeding and the risks of formula feeding- we actually assist in the promotion of formula feeding.
I can provide more evidence on this if there is interest".

Friday 8 January 2010

Medical News: Childhood Abuse Linked to Migraine - in Pediatrics, Domestic Violence from MedPage Today

This important study shows why getting it right during pregnancy and birth are so important. Babies and children must be protected. We have clear evidence of what helps to provide an environment where babies and children are cherished and protected. Childbearing women need to have their needs met, feel respected and valued. Women and their partners who are supported to bond with their babies during pregnancy and experience skin to skin with their babies at birth are less likely to abuse them. Babies who are breastfed are less likely to be abused. If we get it right at the beginning, imagine all the suffering we can eliminate.

Child Abuse Linked to Migraine
by Kristina Fiore, Staff writer, MedPage Today
Published: January 07, 2010
Reviewed by Dori F. Zaleznik, MD, Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston and Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner Some

" Research suggests that there's an interaction between early maltreatment and chronic stress that leads to hypothalmic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysregulation



"Studies suggest that emotional abuse may have more lasting consequences, including psychiatric sequelae, than physical or sexual abuse," the researchers wrote. "Our finding that persons reporting emotional abuse had a significantly earlier age of migraine onset may have implications for its role in migraine pathophysiology."
For the third part of their study, the researchers looked at the relationship between childhood maltreatment and comorbid pain conditions in headache patients.
They found that 61% of patients reported at least one comorbid condition, while 18% reported two, and 13% reported three or more.
Prevalence of pain conditions was as follows:
  • Irritable bowel syndrome: 31%
  • Chronic fatigue syndrome: 16%
  • Fibromyalgia: 10%
  • Interstitial cystitis: 6.5%
  • Arthritis: 25%
  • Endometriosis (in women): 15%
  • Uterine fibroids (in women): 14%
They found that emotional abuse was associated with increased prevalence of irritable bowel syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome, and arthritis, while physical neglect was associated with arthritis.
In women, physical abuse was associated with endometriosis and physical neglect with uterine fibroids.
Medical News: Childhood Abuse Linked to Migraine - in Pediatrics, Domestic Violence from MedPage Today

YouTube - Controlling the Brain with Light (Karl Deisseroth, Stanford University)

Optogenetics: controlling brain cells with lasers
New Scientist Story
7th January 2010 by Ewen Callaway

http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18353-optogenetics-controlling-brain-cells-with-lasers.html

Brain cells can be switched on and off like light bulbs using newly identified microbial proteins that are sensitive to the colour of laser light.
The discovery is the latest in the fast-moving field of optogenetics, which has already given researchers unparalleled control over brain circuits in laboratory animals. The technology may lead to treatments for conditions such as epilepsy, Parkinson's disease and blindness. New Scientist explains the science and its promise.



If you have the patience to sit and watch this video, you will be amazed by what is happening with biotechnology and psychiatry. Great possibilities for much of what ails humanity.

What's this story got to do with birth and midwifery?  Psychiatry seeks to fix brains once they are broken.  The fields of perinatal psychology and epigenetics are explaining how prenatal programming sets the stage and the foundations for many diseases in adulthood.  Depression being one of the diseases that are increasingly linked to prenatal experiences of one kind and another, particularly those to do with elevated hypothalamic, pituitary adrenal axis stimulation in pregnancy (aka the stress response system).

Pregnant women feel better, that is, have lower circulating cortiosteroids (stress hormones) when they feel in control, have choices and feel listened to, valued and respected by their caregiver.  They are more likely to go to term, birth well and breastfeed well . They are also less likely to get gestational diabetes, hypertension and their babies are less likely to need nursery admission.  Midwives are the maternity care specialists who provide the sort of care that women want.  Long term relationships between mothers and babies are better with midwifery care, women feel more satisfied and depression rates are lower.  My take on this is that one to one midwifery care helps by supporting women to feel good, eat well, get enough rest, avoid toxins etc thus giving brains the best opportunity to be built right from the beginning.

YouTube - Controlling the Brain with Light (Karl Deisseroth, Stanford University)

Preterm babies grow better with Mozart's music

Gone are the days when babies were thought to be 'blank slates' requiring only sleep, clean nappies, warmth and food.


Advances in neuroscience demonstrate that babies need much more than cursory attention to their basic physical needs. Babies from birth, whatever their gestation, require love, sensory stimulation including movement, skin to skin experience with their mothers and the opportunity to engage eye to eye with their mothers. Babies are sensitive, social and interactive; constantly seeking to engage; adjusting, learning and developing according to environmental cues, feedback and experiences.

The environmental needs of babies who are born prematurely require thoughtful consideration as they are often in nurseries, handled by strangers even though they are generally kind and well meaning and subject to painful and unpleasant stimuli.




Exciting work, exploring the needs of premature babies is leading to brilliant discoveries by pioneers such as Dr Nils Bergman, who was the first to highlight the tactile needs of premature babies and developed kangaroo mothercare, or skin to skin baby wearing for premature infants and their mothers.



Dr Bergman demonstrated that premature babies who had 'kangaroo care' stabilise better and faster, cry less, fuss less, grow better and have enhanced brain development. Mother/baby bonding is improved too.

http://www.kangaroomothercare.com/


The recognition that babies are people too and thrive in an enriched environment has had another boost.

A new study carried out by Dr. Dror Mandel and Dr. Ronit Lubetzky of the Tel Aviv Medical Center affiliated with Tel Aviv University's Sackler School of Medicine has found that pre-term exposed to thirty minutes of Mozart's in one session, once per day expend less energy -- and therefore need fewer calories to grow rapidly -- than when they are not "listening" to the music.
"It's not exactly clear how the music is affecting them, but it makes them calmer and less likely to be agitated," says Dr. Mendel, a lecturer at Tel Aviv University.
In the study, Dr. Mandel and Dr. Lubetzky and their team measured the of music by Mozart played to pre-term newborns for 30 minutes. After the music was played, the researchers measured infants' energy expenditure again, and compared it to the amount of energy expended when the baby was at rest. After "hearing" the music, the infant expended less energy, a process that can lead to faster weight gain.
A "musical environment" for preemies
When it comes to preemies, one of the main priorities for doctors is to get the baby up to an acceptable body weight so he or she can be sent home. At the hospital, preterm babies may be exposed to infections and other illnesses, and a healthy body weight keeps them immune to other problems in the future.
While the scientists are not sure what occasioned the response, Dr. Mandel offers one hypothesis. "The repetitive melodies in Mozart's music may be affecting the organizational centers of the brain's ," he says. "Unlike Beethoven, Bach or Bartok, Mozart's music is composed with a melody that is highly repetitive. This might be the musical explanation. For the scientific one, more investigation is needed."
The study came about through an international project led by the U.S.-based consortium NIDCAP, whose goal is to create a set of standard practices to optimize the health and well-being of neonates. A number of environmental effects, such as tactile stimulation and room lighting, are already known to affect the survival and health of these very susceptible babies.

A sonata a day keeps the doctor away

Wonderful to see this work steadily improving the lot of premature babies and their mothers. However, we need to also focus on preventing prematurity as premature babies have extra risks and potential burdens to deal with as they grow outside the womb. One to one midwifery care with a midwife who respects, listens and cares for the individual woman provides a space place for the woman to explore becoming a mother; process her stressful feelings and develop self confidence. In such a capacity building environment, stress hormones are diminished because women feel valued and in control; inflammatory processes are not triggered and babies grow better and to term.

Aging well starts in womb, as mom's choices affect whole life - USATODAY.com


During the crucial "window of opportunity" before birth and during infancy, environmental cues help "program" a person's DNA, says Alexander Jones of Great Ormond Street Hospital in London and the University College of London Institute for Child Health. This happens through a delicate interplay of genes and the environment called epigenetics, which can determine how a baby reacts for the rest of its life, Jones says.
Through epigenetics, chemical groups attach to DNA. Although they don't change the order of the genes, the chemical groups can switch those genes on or off, Jones says.
Many things, such as chemical contaminants, can cause epigenetic changes. So babies exposed in the womb to synthetic hormones may begin responding abnormally to the natural hormones later made by their own bodies, says Hugh Taylor of Yale University School of Medicine".


"Babies and children also can develop abnormal reactions to stress, says Jack Shonkoff of Harvard University, co-author of a June paper on early influences in health in The Journal of the American Medical Association.
In the short term, reacting to typical, everyday difficulties can help people develop a healthy response to stress.
But persistent, "toxic" stress — such as neglect or extreme poverty — may program a child's nervous system to be on perpetual high alert. Over time, this can damage the immune response and lead to chronic ailments, such as heart disease and depression, the study says.


Aging well starts in womb, as mom's choices affect whole life - USATODAY.com

Wonderful to see the scientific literature on prenatal programming and epigenetics making into the mainstream arena. People who are thinking about becoming parents will find this information critical to their decision making. I wrote about preconceptual and pregnancy work in the book "Birth Territory and Midwifery Guardianship". For anyone who wants to learn more, they may find the book very useful.



Preconceptual counselling with a midwife is a big step in the right direction to managing the complexities of modern life and becoming a parent. Every parent wants the best for their children. This information helps them do take responsibility, seek out support and information before they get pregnant, then take the steps necessary to ensure a 'head' and 'heart' start for their child.

Thursday 7 January 2010

How Childhood Trauma Can Cause Adult Obesity - Yahoo! News

"Early adverse experience can disrupt the body's metabolic systems," says Shonkoff. "One of the cornerstones of biology is that our body's systems when they are young are reading the environment and establishing patterns to be maximally adaptive."
Researchers also posit that high levels of stress hormones caused by Adverse Childhood Experiences, known as ACEs can wear down the body over time. A temporary spike in blood pressure in response to a stressful event may be useful to power an adaptive fight-or-flight response, but over the long term constant high blood pressure could raise a person's risk for heart attack and stroke. Studies have also found that consistently elevated levels of stress hormones, like cortisol, can lead to permanent damage in certain brain regions linked to depression.
Recently, scientists have discovered that these changes can themselves be passed down from one generation to the next - a burgeoning new area of study called epigenetics. Such research may have significant and long-term implications for the prevention of obesity, addiction and other illnesses related to early life stress. After all, reducing childhood exposure to trauma in one generation may further benefit that generation's children and grandchildren.
If, for instance, a modern child's early life experience - in the womb and during the first five years, particularly - is constantly stressful, it would be incredibly energy-consuming, says Dr. Bruce Perry, senior fellow at the ChildTrauma Academy. "If your genes get the message that you are entering a stressful world, it makes complete adaptive sense to take the existing metabolism and tune it up to deposit fat and store energy to prepare for what the body is expecting will be a challenging and stressful life," he says".
How Childhood Trauma Can Cause Adult Obesity - Yahoo! News

Epigenetics is one of the fields of science that is demonstrating the importance of one to one midwifery care throughout the childbearing period for women and their families. Unmitigated stress leads to genetic, inflammatory and physiological changes that can be permanent. Homeostasis is disrupted and a process called Allostasis is triggered. Allostasis is when body systems are upregulated to cope with unrelieved stress and stress hormones.

Genes


When women feel cared about and valued and have a midwife to talk to about the day to day, moment to moment anxieties, fears and challenges that life and pregnancy brings, their stress response is dampened and their connection response is triggered. Discussing feelings, nutrition, exercise, relationships and changes with a midwife who cares and is interested is capacity building.

The human brain may contain up to one trillion neurons. These nerve cells are interconnected, as shown in this microscopic image, so that they can transmit electrical impulses—and information—to other cells. Image by 3D4Medical.com/Getty Images: National Geographic



When women feel in control, their stress hormones are down, their wellbeing hormones are up and they feel better about themselves. When women are informed and feel in control, they are more likely to do the self care things that help grow healthy babies.

Wednesday 6 January 2010

Obstetricians attitude to delayed cord clamping

Obstetricians attitude to cord clamping Midwives who work with women in a one to one relationship based way with childbearing women weren't at all surprised when researchers found massive benefits with leaving the cord alone after birth for the newborn. Midwives working with women they know are also very aware of the benefits to the mother of leaving the cord alone after birth. Mainstream maternity care has yet to recognise or discover that aspect.

Photo from Wikipedia


Now that current evidence indicates that leaving the umbilical cord to pulsate for at least 3 minutes after birth confers many benefits to newborns, recommendations have been made to change established hospital practice and leave the cord to pulsate. Benefits for the baby from the extra minutes of blood transferred from the placenta include: stem cells, optimal lung and cerebral perfusion, increased number of red blood cells, appropriate blood volume transfer and placentally transferred oxygen during those precious moments as the baby switches from intra to extra uterine life and circulation; reduced rate of sepsis, reduced rates of intraventricular haemorrhage and reduced rates of necrotising enterocolitis.

Two intrepid researchers, both consultant obstetricians, sought to discover whether obstetricians have changed practice in regards to cord clamping in light of the new insights about the value of cord blood to the infant following birth.

Doctors Ononeze and Hutchon‌ said in their article in the Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (2009)

"Questionnaires were given to obstetricians from 43 different units in UK, other EU countries, USA, Canada, Australia etc. There was a 100% responserate. 53% adopted the recommendation only occasionally whereas 37% have never. Difficulty with implementation in clinical practice was the main reason for failure to adopt recommendation. Unawareness of the evidence of the benefits of delayed cord clamping was the reason in half of the non-compliant group".

Interesting that so many obstetricians a) didn't know about the benefits of leaving the cord to pulsate after birth and b) didn't believe the evidence and c) found it difficult to do in practice. The researchers disagreed leaving the cord to pulsate was difficult in practice, so we can only assume it is because the doctors were not prepared to wait those few minutes.

Given that evidence informed practice is touted at every opportunity in contemporary health care, it is very surprising that our medical colleagues are not up to date and can't find ways to put evidence to work for the better health of babies.

"There is no consensus amongst medical and midwifery staff as to when to clamp the cord following delivery of the newborn. The tradition in obstetric practice is to clamp the cord immediately after birth".

The lack of consensus in timing of cord clamping may well exist in the system that approaches birth as a moving conveyor belt experience in a factory, however those of us who work in relationship based practice are agreed that the best time to cut the clamp and cut the cord depends upon the mother's thinking about how to manage her placenta. For those women who want to leave the baby and placenta attached, then the cord is never clamped and cut. The cord falls off the baby's umbilicus in it's own time. For others, they choose to birth their placenta, then clamp and cut it. Once women understand the process of third stage, they choose to manage it themselves and do very well.

Fabulous to see these two obstetricians doing such great work. Their perspective and honesty is commendable.

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009 Apr;29(3):223-4.

Tuesday 5 January 2010

YouTube - Ignorance Meets Knowledge (extended breastfeeding)

A delightful video normalising extended breastfeeding. Nutrition and health are hot topics at the moment. This video is a great message for our times.




YouTube - Ignorance Meets Knowledge (extended breastfeeding)

t r u t h o u t | Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy

Paulo Freire has been an inspiration to me and his theory has underpinned and informed my work in my roles as educator and midwife ever since I first read his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed". This respectful, thought provoking, beautifully written article "Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy" by Henry A. Giroux, provides an inspiring lens on the most amazing educational theorist ever to grace this earth.

Giroux says, about Freire:

Occupying the often difficult space between existing politics and the as yet possible, Paulo Freire spent most of his life working in the belief that the radical elements of democracy are worth struggling for, that critical education is a basic element of social change and that how we think about politics is inseparable from how we come to understand the world, power and the moral life we aspire to lead. In many ways, Paulo embodied the important but often problematic relationship between the personal and the political. His own life was a testimonial not only to his belief in democracy, but also to the notion that one's life had to come as close as possible to modeling the social relations and experiences that spoke to a more humane and democratic future. At the same time, Paulo never moralized about politics, never employed the discourse of shame or collapsed the political into the personal when talking about social issues. For him, private problems had to be understood in relation to larger public issues. Everything about him suggested that the first order of politics was humility, compassion and a willingness to fight against human injustices.


For anyone who cares about education, liberation and personal mastery, this article is a must read.

t r u t h o u t | Rethinking Education as the Practice of Freedom: Paulo Freire and the Promise of Critical Pedagogy

Monday 4 January 2010

Celebrate what's right with the world - Dewitt Jones on Yahoo! Video

The patron saint of what's right with birth, Dr Sarah Buckley shared this video. Sarah wrote the lovely Gentle Birth, Gentle Mothering book. Sarah's book explains the possibilities with birth in language that is clear and accessible. The information, like that contained in this video, is also applicable by any woman who wants to birth her baby in an optimal way.



As Dewitt Jones said at the end of this beautiful, inspirational video

"Incredible things happen when we are open to possibilities. The world is a wonderful place"

Sunday 3 January 2010

Mothers' views of maternity: interventions

Mothers' views of maternity: interventions
January 2, 2010 -The Age newspaper

The president of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, Dr Ted Weaver, said while a fear of litigation arising from complications of vaginal births had partly driven intervention rates in recent years, more women were also asking for them than before.

He said this trend meant many private obstetricians felt they should agree to interventions if their patients had been properly counselled on the pros and cons of the procedures.

''In private, most doctors will do [elective caesareans] because they think if I don't do it, someone else will do it. It's about consumer demand,'' he said.


Mothers' views of maternity: interventions

Now we are blaming women for asking for interventions after years of scaring women about birth! You will note it is still about money.

"If I don't do it someone else will".


Wouldn't you love to be a fly on the wall to hear the 'proper counsel on the pros and cons of the procedures'? This statement reminds me of a great cartoon some time back in MIDIRS, the English publication on all matters to do with childbearing. The cartoon had a doctor, complete with stethoscope around the neck and white coat, sitting talking to an anxious looking pregnant woman sitting on the edge of her chair. The first frame showed the doctor saying "of course I believe in choice". The second frame had the doctor waving his hand expansively saying "you can bleed to death at home or have your baby safely in hospital!!"

I would encourage you all to obtain Labouring Under an Illusion. Have a look at my entry on 22nd December Social construction of Childbirth - how the media works for details and the trailer for the movie.

Mother, baby revived after 'dying' in labor - Heart health- msnbc.com

What a blessing that this young mother and her baby revived and survived.

Mother, baby revived after 'dying' in labor - Heart health- msnbc.com

What I found particularly interesting is that the woman had an epidural minutes before the circulatory collapse. Her husband noticed her colour was blue and when the nurses checked her, she had no pulse.

The fact that an epidural had been administered had not made it into any of the news reports that heralded the story about the miracle of this woman and her baby's survival.

The doctors are at a loss to explain what happened to this young woman.

Yet, there are several possible explanations with the administration of an epidural in labour:

1. The anaesthetic agent could have been inserted into a vein by mistake causing cardiogenic shock
2. The epidural block may have been too high, causing paralysis of the intercostal muscles and respiratory arrest and then cardiac arrest
3. Allergic reaction to the anaesthetic agent

None of these possibilities have been explored in the news. What this story does of course is add to the general fear cascade around 'birth' in western culture. The 'problem' in this story is not with labour, it is with the intervention, the epidural administration. The problem needs to be attributed to where it rightfully belongs. Where most of the problems with birth lie is with the interventions that are 'done to' birthing women. Instead of providing every childbearing woman with one to one midwifery care that enables a woman to feel valued and cared about, work through her feelings about becoming a mother and then supported to give birth in her unique way, according to her own body biorythms, women are fed a steady diet of fear and problems, anaesthetised, poked, prodded and pushed. The way that the normal natural process of birth is tampered with is what leads to the problems that women experience.

Fear is a powerful force for shaping women's experiences of birth. The trouble lies in our cultural conditioning and media portrayals of birth. Fear makes us compliant and anxious. Instead of women perceiving the birth of their babies as something special and transformational, they are encouraged to rush to take 'whatever' modern medicine provides for deadening the feelings associated with the experience.

Unfortunately the 'cure' can often be far worse than the experience itself.

This story should have read " Mother, baby revived after 'dying' post epidural"

EWG Minority Cord Blood Report Executive Summary | Environmental Working Group

A two-year study involving five independent research laboratories in the United States, Canada and the Netherlands has found up to 232 toxic chemicals in the umbilical cord blood of 10 babies from racial and ethnic minority groups. The findings constitute hard evidence that each child was exposed to a host of dangerous substances while still in its mother’s womb.
Government, academic and independent biomonitoring studies, including those by EWG, have detected up to 358 industrial chemicals, pesticides and pollutants in the cord blood of American infants. Exploring the so-called “additive” effects of possible carcinogens, hormone disrupters and neurotoxins is a new and urgent priority for environmental health scientists. EWG supports this very important work.

But as this science moves forward, we need to act now to reduce exposures that present the greatest health threats based on what we know today, even as scientists struggle to understand how the cocktail of chemicals in the womb could harm current and future generations.

Many of the up to 232 compounds detected in this study have been the target of regulatory action and government controls. As a rule, however, these actions came far too late, well after the environment and the human race were polluted to a degree that has raised serious health concerns. Our failure to act quickly has ensured that these chemicals will continue to pollute future generations for decades, even centuries to come.

EWG Minority Cord Blood Report Executive Summary | Environmental Working Group

Australia's maternity system like 'herding yards'

Mother Care: It's like herding yards

JULIA MEDEW
January 2, 2010

"Chronic shortages in Australia's maternity system have left mothers feeling like cattle being pushed through herding yards that put both their own and their babies' lives at risk.

A survey of 2792 mothers by Fairfax Media found that about half of those who had given birth in the past five years believed the maternity system was not coping well enough with soaring demand".



WHAT MOTHERS SAY

''There should be more continuity of care. Knowing your carer and trusting your carer removes the fear from childbirth and fear leads to more interventions.''
''There is a severe shortage of birth centre places available and in many areas it is not even an option.''

''There are so many time limits imposed on women which completely disregard the natural progression of labour in women's bodies. Doctors are too quick to intervene, too impatient to wait and allow the body to do its job.''

Chronic shortages in Australia's maternity system

A child is born

One to one midwifery care puts the woman at the centre of care and ensures that she feels valued, listened to and cared about. Nicola Roxon needs to listen to what women want and ensure that private midwifery is a viable option for those women who want individualised maternity care. The move to publically funded midwifery models of care is a welcome move, however, those models are unable to provide what a private midwife can provide and all models are needed to meet the individual needs of Australian women.

Solution to killer superbug found in Norway

The says is one of the leading public health threats on the planet. A six-month investigation by The Associated Press found overuse and misuse of medicines has led to mutations in once curable diseases like tuberculosis and malaria, making them harder and in some cases impossible to treat.

Antibiotic use in most western countries is widespread. Antibiotics are given as first line of treatment for just about anything you like to mention. In maternity care, antibiotics are poured into pregnant women who test positive for Group B Streptococcus on vaginal swabs and those pregnant and labouring women whose 'waters' (membranes) have been 'broken' for longer than 18 hours. Antibiotics are used as a cure all, even when there is nothing that can be cured by them, even though antibiotic resistence is rising and even though antibiotic use is associated with long term problems for the infant.

However, Norway has taken a radical approach to antibiotic use. Norweigans have stopped pushing antibiotics. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (), a virulent killer in most hospitals in the west, has been controlled in Norway because Norweigans take less antibiotics.

"Penicillin is not a cough medicine," says the tissue packet on the desk of Norway's MRSA control director, Dr. Petter Elstrom.

"Norwegians are sanguine about their coughs and colds, toughing it out through low-grade infections. "We don't throw antibiotics at every person with a fever. We tell them to hang on, wait and see, and we give them a Tylenol to feel better," says Dr John Birger Haug, the infectious disease specialist. And because Norwegian doctors prescribe fewer antibiotics than any other country, people do not have a chance to develop resistance to them.

According to a press release on December 31 st 2009 by Associated Press Writers, MARTHA MENDOZA and MARGIE MASON, Aker University Hospital's pharmacy does not stock the newest, most expensive antibiotics, because as Dr Haug says "because if we have them here, doctors will use them."
I've noticed that doctors, at least in places I've worked, are frightened not to prescribe antibiotics for fear of being sued if 'something goes wrong'. Fear of litigation is a huge issue in our country and common sense goes out the window when this fear is activated. The mantra in mainstream medicine, at least, for those involved with the care of birthing women is the more you do, the safer you are, however, the safety factor is about being protected from litigation NOT what is best for the woman and her baby.
Group B streptococcus (GBS) management is a perfect example of how fear of litigation overtakes common sense. In Norway, women who test postitive for GBS in pregnancy are offered a Chlorhexidine solution vaginal douche in early labour and every six hours to minimise the potential risk of GBS transmission to the fetus/newborn. The use of this douche is dismissed as unscientific in Australia because doctors prefer the 'security' associated with IV administration of antibiotics.


Thank goodness some doctors and health services are more open minded. At John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, where routine screening of all pregnant women at 34-36 weeks for GBS colonisation is recommended, while women are advised that antibiotics in labour are the preferred option, they are informed about Chlorhexidine douche. The policy of providing chlorhexidine douche as an option  for GBS prophylaxis came about following the visit of a Norweigan Obstetrician who explained their successful approach to GBS management.


When women are given the information about GBS colonisation and risks of infection and a choice of having an IV cannula in their arm and IV antibioitics or a self administered vaginal douche as a prophylaxis for GBS infection, the overwhelming majority of women choose the douche.

Despite the misgivings of the paediatric and some obstetric staff, no baby whose mother has used Chlorhexidine vaginal douche for GBS prophylaxis has been infected with GBS in four years.

Chlorhexidine vaginal douche as prophylaxis for GBS colonisiation is a cheap, easy, benign and effective solution (no pun intended) to the rampant use of antibiotics, and all the long term iatrogenic sequelae, in pregnant and labouring women. The use of a chlorhexidine douche for this common condition will not only be safer for babies long term health, it will help contain antibiotic resistence, ensuring that antibiotics will be effective if ever a person truly needed them.



Solution to killer superbug found in Norway